MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132895885

Cellular Impact of Local Sub-ablative Radiotherapy on Pleural Mesothelioma

2025· dissertation· W7132895885 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Shariati

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemTumor microenvironmentRadiation therapyChemokineCXCL10ImmunotherapyEndothelial stem cellCCL2Cell
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we optimized a subcutaneous mouse model of pleural mesothelioma and demonstrated that local radiotherapy (LRT) can suppress tumor growth for up to eight days post-treatment. Single-cell RNA sequencing of tumor samples identified diverse tumor microenvironment cell types, including T cells, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. LRT-treated tumors exhibited major compositional shifts toward a pro-inflammatory state, with increased infiltration of CD8⁺ T cells and Ly6Chigh monocytes/macrophages. After treatment, endothelial cells upregulated CXCL10 expression, generating a chemotactic gradient to enhance immune cell recruitment. Evidence further suggested activation of the non-canonical STING (stimulator of interferon genes) pathway in fibroblasts and endothelial cells eight days post-treatment, potentially contributing to tumor regrowth. Concurrently, we observed sustained p53 signaling in these cell types (ie. fibroblasts and endothelial cells), marked by prolonged Cdkn1a upregulation. These findings indicate that LRT-induced DNA damage may trigger a senescence-associated secretory phenotype, which initially amplifies anti-tumor immune responses but later promotes pro-tumorigenic remodeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicOccupational and environmental lung diseases→French-language works237,207→