MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132897430

Determining the Significance of BORF2 Interaction with A3B and p53 in EBV Infection

2023· dissertation· W7132897430 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jaime Dario Yockteng Melgar

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSecretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
KeywordsLytic cycleVirusGenomeViral replicationCytidine deaminaseViral proteinPopulationEpstein–Barr virusViral life cycleIntrinsic immunity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpesvirus that infects over 90% of the world's population and is a causative agent of several types of cancers. EBV establishes lifelong infection in the host by alternating between latent and lytic infection. During the lytic phase of infection, the virus produces a cascade of ~70 proteins, many of which function to manipulate cellular processes to enable efficient production of virions. However, the functions of many of these proteins are poorly understood. In this study, I identified novel functions of the EBV lytic protein BORF2, that interacts with the cellular proteins APOBEC3B (A3B) and p53. A3B is a member of the APOBEC3 family of cytidine deaminases, which play a critical role in innate immune defense against viral infections by inducing hypermutation of viral genomes. p53 is a tumor suppressor protein that regulates the cell cycle and plays a critical role in G1/S arrest. Using affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS), our lab discovered that BORF2 interacts with A3B and p53. I confirmed this interaction through proteomic and fluorescent microscopy experiments. My results also showed that BORF2 protects the viral genome by sequestering A3B away from the EBV replication compartment. Furthermore, we collaborated with the Harris lab at the University of Minnesota to perform infection assays which showed that BORF2 protects the EBV genome from A3B mutations. We also found that the interaction between BORF2 and A3B is conserved in KSHV with its viral protein ORF61, homologue of BORF2. In addition to its interaction with A3B, I showed that BORF2 induces p53 independently of A3B binding. My immunofluorescence microscopy experiments revealed that p53 bodies were juxtaposed to and not co-localized with BORF2-A3B bodies. However, in the absence of A3B, p53 co-localized with BORF2. My results suggest that A3B outcompetes p53 for the interaction with BORF2, leading us to propose a competition model where BORF2 can only induce G1/S through a p53-dependent manner in cells that express A3B. Therefore, my research has provided new insights into the mechanisms by which EBV protects its genome from A3B mutagenesis and contributes to G1/S arrest. The discovery of the mechanism by which EBV neutralizes A3B may provide opportunities for the development of therapeutic approaches against EBV as well as A3B-induced cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicViral-associated cancers and disorders→French-language works237,207→