MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132897672

Digital Media as a Tool of Rhetorical Amplification in Historical Performance

2025· dissertation· W7132897672 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J.Bud Roach

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsRhetorical questionRhetoricMateriality (auditing)Rhetorical deviceGesturePoetryDigital media
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of digital media to display text and images has become a frequent feature of classical music concerts in recent years, including the field of Historical Performance. What is rarely considered is the potential of the image to amplify rhetorical invention present in text and music. This research project addressed the communicative barriers to meaningful rhetorical exchange that contemporary audiences are expected to overcome—foreign language, unfamiliar poetic meter, and unknown cultural allusions—and sought to create a methodology for using digital media as visual rhetoric, enhancing the rhetorical devices present in text and music.The historical performance practice of self-accompanied Italian and English monody on the theorbo formed the basis of this enquiry, as historical sources identify this genre as best exemplifying the ancient oratorical traditions upon which the study of rhetoric was founded. The priorities of the early seventeenth-century seconda pratica, or second practice, are more readily understood by considering the origins of classical rhetoric, its use in the highly expressive poetry of the Middle Ages and Renaissance, and the eventual intersection of music and rhetoric in the sixteenth century. And when the combination of poetic and musical rhetoric becomes the basis upon which visual media applications are introduced in historical performance, projected images and text serve the original performance goal of moving the emotions of the listener. Experiments with the materiality of textual display include handmade paper, linocut printmaking, drypoint etching, gel plate monoprint, cyanotype and anthotype photo processing. By prioritizing rhetorical accountability by first identifying linguistic gesture mirrored in musical rhetoric and then creating visual displays of text to extend these communicative devices, a simple template was formulated that links visual display with rhetorical practice. Further applications of this research extend beyond seventeenth-century monody to any other performance genres that were conceived as vehicles for artful eloquence, where the introduction of visual display may amplify rhetorical invention for a contemporary audience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207