DYNAMICAL SIGNATURES OF EXOTIC PHASES IN FRUSTRATED HONEYCOMB MAGNETS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In magnetic systems, adding an ingredient known as frustration gives rise to a variety of intriguing phases. One of these phases is the quantum spin liquid (QSL), which hosts exotic quasiparticle excitations and exhibits long-range entanglement without conventional magnetic order. Recent experiments on a frustrated honeycomb material α-RuCl3 have observed a half-quantized thermal conductivity in the presence of an external magnetic field, potentially signalling the presence of a QSL known as a chiral Kitaev spin liquid (KSL). However, the extent of this half-quantization remains experimentally contentious, necessitating a deeper exploration of other mechanisms that may influence the thermal Hall effect. In this thesis, we investigate three types of dynamical probes for frustrated honeycomb magnets using semiclassical and classical simulations. First, we delve into the thermal Hall conductivity from magnetically ordered states, and we demonstrate various aspects of the experiment that can be explained using topological magnons. Indeed, we show that the true test for a chiral KSL will be a half-quantized plateau at low temperatures where the magnon contributions are suppressed. Next, we investigate inelastic neutron scattering (INS), one of the primary probes for investigating excitations of spin systems. In experiments, the thermal Hall conductivity is measured at finite temperature and field, where there is a crossover between Majorana fermions and magnons. We offer insights into this crossover region by computing the dynamical spin structure factor (DSSF) for various classical models with large Kitaev interactions. Our results for a minimal model for α-RuCl3 exhibit continuum-like behaviour in the DSSF for various classical orders, echoing the characteristics of the quantum model. Finally, given the limitations of INS in distinguishing between different excitation continua, we examine the nonlinear response using two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy (2DCS). We find distinguishing features between the KSL, classical spin liquids, and large unit cell magnetic orders, despite all producing a broad continuum in INS. Overall, this work demonstrates the potential of 2DCS in elucidating the complex physics underlying ambiguous spin excitation continua, thereby advancing our comprehension of the dynamics in these frustrated systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".