MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132900502

Analyzing the Performance Gaps in Passive House Retrofit and New Construction Multi-Unit Residential Buildings

2024· dissertation· W7132900502 on OpenAlexaffabout
Junsoo Park

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy performanceCertificationVentilation (architecture)Efficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)Natural ventilationEnergy consumption
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ensuring buildings operate as designed is critical to achieving performance goals related to energy and carbon emissions as well as health and comfort. This thesis examines energy and ventilation performance in multi-unit residential buildings (MURBs) constructed to Passive House and EnerPHit standards in Hamilton, Ontario. Discrepancies in energy performance arise from design assumptions, occupant behavior, and weather conditions. To address these, recommendations are made about proactive design strategies and ensuring mechanical system specifications are adhered to during construction. Ventilation performance deviations highlight the ongoing necessity for post-occupancy monitoring and regular recommissioning. This is recommended to ensure that the building performance adheres to the established certification (e.g. Passive House). In conclusion, the study offers valuable insights for future MURB projects, emphasizing the pivotal role of research team involvement in the design phase and continuous verification of system performance to identify and learn from the energy and ventilation performance gaps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization→French-language works237,207→