Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phenylalanine requirement for healthy adult males and children fed a diet without tyrosine was determined by the IAAO method using lysine as the indicator. Five healthy men and children were studied at graded levels of phenylalanine, devoid of tyrosine. The mean phenylalanine requirement, in the absence of tyrosine, was estimated to be 48 mg·kg-1·d -1 for healthy adult males and 28 mg·kg-1·d -1 for healthy children. The lower estimated requirement for children could be due to lower phenylalanine hydroxylation rate in the response of the substrate in children. Lower urinary tyrosine/phenylalanine concentration ratios in children implied that the rate of phenylalanine hydroxylation may be limited. The study indicates that phenylalanine alone may not provided the entire needs of aromatic amino acids in children fed a diet without tyrosine. There is no agreement in the current literature on the estimates for aromatic amino acid (phenylalanine plus tyrosine) requirements for healthy adults determined by stable isotope techniques. In addition, there is no data on the estimates for aromatic amino acid requirements by those techniques for healthy children. The choice of the best indicator is still under debate; however, phenylalanine and lysine have been used frequently in the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) method. Leucine has not been evaluated as an indicator, but has been used in the 24-h indicator amino acid oxidation and balance technique. In order to examine the suitability of leucine as the indicator, seven adult males were studied in the identical study design of the previous study, but this time leucine was used as the indicator. With the intention of determining the effect of leucine intakes on the response pattern, the study contained two parts with two different leucine daily intakes: an excess leucine intake of 65 mg·kg-1·d-1 and the mean requirement of 45 mg·kg-1·d-1. The clear pattern of partitioning of the indicator amino acid between oxidation and protein synthesis was not observed at the higher leucine intake, but could be seen at the lower leucine intake. The requirement estimated was not different from that obtained using lysine as the indicator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".