MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132902633

Nonlinearity-Aware Filtering and Constellation Design for the Fibre-Optic Channel

2025· dissertation· W7132902633 on OpenAlexaff
Susanna Elizabeth Rumsey

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodebookFilter (signal processing)Coding (social sciences)Probabilistic logicPrincipal component analysisFilter designControl theory (sociology)Coding gainRedundancy (engineering)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present two methods for reducing error rates in fibre-optic communications by taking into account the nonlinearity of the channel. For single-channel short-range links, we present a method for redesigning the output filter response using a new statistical tool which we describe in depth. For multi-channel long-haul fibres, we present a coding and modulation system that reduces inter-channel interference. In the single-channel short-haul case, we show that matched filtering at the outputwith a root-raised-cosine pulse is nonoptimal. We do this by constructing an output filter with improved performance. The new system includes out-of-band frequencies in the filter response in order to obtain lower-error results. We design this new filter response using a novel variation on principal component analysis that generates quasi-cyclic principal components. We name this new tool quasicyclic principal component analysis (QPCA), and additionally describe some of its nonfibre applications. In the multi-channel long-haul case, we construct a bounded-energy codebook that provides improved performance over existing schemes, not only through carefully designed symbol-level probabilistic shaping, but also through codeword-level shaping. This allows us to reduce inter-channel interference: specifically it gives an improvement of about 0.5 dB at the optimal operating point with simplified phase tracking. This performance improvement is reduced but not eliminated in the case of exact phase information at the output. In particular, the error-correction capabilities of our coding scheme are competitive with existing schemes, notably enumerative sphere shaping, while exhibiting improved runtime and space complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207