MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132903521

Accelerating Internet Scale Distributed Machine Learning

2024· dissertation· W7132903521 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingThroughputOverlay networkScale (ratio)The InternetDistributed learningPipeline transportDistributed algorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As training large-scale foundational models on globally distributed datasets becomes increasingly commonplace, deploying distributed machine learning (ML) pipelines across cloud platforms becomes a pivotal strategy due to cost and regulatory constraints. However, this strategy is often impractical due to the limited and dynamic network connection quality over the Internet. To address this bottleneck, we propose Strato, a high-speed overlay network atop data centers and clouds, capable of relaying data across multiple paths while reacting nimbly against network changes with optimized policies. On the foundation of Strato, we optimize the communication of distributed ML algorithms over the internet with a novel multi-path traffic optimization algorithm, FairSlot, designed to maximize the throughput of distributed ML pipelines. Our extensive experiments show that Strato and FairSlot can substantially improve the training speed of distributed ML algorithms. We hope our findings offer valuable insights into the design of modern, cloud-agnostic infrastructures for machine learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207