MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132904486

An Examination of Benders' Decomposition Approaches in Large-scale Healthcare Optimization Problems

2015· dissertation· W7132904486 on OpenAlexaff
Curtiss Luong

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2015
Typedissertation
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecompositionScheduling (production processes)Job shop schedulingBenders' decompositionOptimization problemDecomposition method (queueing theory)Automated planning and scheduling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Benders' decomposition is an important tool used to solve large-scale optimization problems found in healthcare. Radiation therapy and operating room planning and scheduling are two areas in which Benders' decomposition have been applied to solve difficult problems. In radiation therapy, we develop two novel Benders' algorithms, including a classical Benders' algorithm and a combinatorial Benders' algorithm, to solve the sector duration and optimization problem efficiently. In operating room planning and scheduling, we implement an existing logic-based Benders' algorithm for tactical operating room planning and scheduling and analyze the effect of changes to the input data on various output statistics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationFrench-language works237,207