MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132906240

The role of protein kinase C-epsilon (PKCepsilon) in ischemic preconditioning cardioprotection induced by enhancement of cell volume regulation

2006· dissertation· W7132906240 on OpenAlexaff
Azadeh Boloorchi

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2006
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardioprotectionProtein kinase CIschemic preconditioningCellIschemiaProgrammed cell deathMechanism (biology)Phosphorylation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enhancement of cell volume regulation is a key mechanism of cardioprotection induced by ischemic preconditioning. The specific role of PKC egr; in modulating IPC protection against necrosis via an enhanced volume regulatory mechanism was addressed using a combined molecular and pharmacological approach in primary culture of adult rabbit cardiomyocytes. It was found that (1) PKC egr; protects against ischemic cell death in a pathway that includes Cl - channel activity downstream, (2) PKC egr; limits the extent of ischemic cardiomyocyte swelling with Cl- channel activity downstream of PKC egr;, (C) PKC egr; is involved in normal cell volume regulation in oxygenated cardiomyocytes, and Cl- activity is downstream of PKC egr; in this response. The findings of this study support the hypothesis that the mechanism of PKC egr; - mediated cardioprotection includes the activation of potent cell volume regulatory mechanisms, which delay ischemic cell swelling and cell death and involve the activation of volume regulated Cl- channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207