MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132909382

The role of tumour necrosis factor-[alpha] in an animal model of Kawasaki disease

2005· dissertation· W7132909382 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Joyce Siu-Wah Hui-Yuen

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2005
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicKawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoArthritis Society
KeywordsKawasaki diseaseVasculitisArteritisTumor necrosis factor alphaCytokineInflammationAneurysmImmune systemCoronary arteries
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kawasaki disease (KD) is the most common cause of multisystem vasculitis in childhood. Its propensity for aneurysm formation makes KD quite unique among coronary artery diseases, and the leading cause of pediatric acquired heart disease in the developed world. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) is a pleiotropic inflammatory cytokine elevated during the acute phase of KD. In a murine model of KD, rapid TNFalpha production occurs in the peripheral immune system after disease induction. This immune response becomes site-directed, with migration to coronary arteries dependent on TNFalpha mediated events. Production of TNFalpha in the heart is coincident with the presence of inflammatory infiltrate at the coronary arteries, which persists during aneurysm development. Ablation of TNFalpha effector functions abrogated inflammation and elastin breakdown in coronary vessels, rendering mice resistant to coronary arteritis and aneurysm formation. Thus, TNFalpha is necessary for development of coronary artery lesions in an animal model of Kawasaki disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicKawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications→French-language works237,207→