MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132909921

Pustaka Pūjā: A Study of Sūtra Worship in Mahāyāna Buddhism

2022· dissertation· W7132909921 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alexander James O'Neill

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoGovernment of CanadaGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsWorshipBuddhismAgency (philosophy)HinduismOralityDisciplineScholarship
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study deals with the questions of why Mahāyāna texts advocate book worship, what forms of worship they advocate, and what their worship was like historically and in the present day. In answering these questions, it first employs a textual study of Mahāyāna Buddhist, non-Mahāyāna Buddhist, and Brahmanical textual references to book worship or the agency of speech. Secondly, it engages with contemporary Newar Buddhist texts and practices related to Buddhist book wor-ship in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. The methodological approach of this study is based in the fields of the study of orality, paratexts, materiality, and book history. Going beyond the bounds of the disciplinary silos of Buddhist studies and South Asian studies, it shows how a trans-sectarian understanding of agency and orality is necessary to explain trends in the development of Buddhist and Brahmanical manuscript culture and worship. On that basis, this study suggests that while South Asian religions view divine speech as imbued with ritual agency, Mahāyāna Buddhist book worship used the same logic with the physical book in advocating their worship. Furthermore, while not renouncing orality, Mahāyāna Buddhist literature hardwired self-referential prescriptions for their worship within the body of their texts to promote themselves in physical form in a way that freed it from reliance upon the system of oral transmission upon which the non-Mahāyāna nikāya and āgama literature relied. Tracing the form of that worship throughout the first millennium, this thesis shows how it became increasingly tantricised, resulting in the incorporation of the Mahāyāna sūtras within maṇḍalas. A continuity of ancient forms of book worship and recitation, as well as a continually evolving and adapting tradition, is explored in the case of Newar Buddhist book worship and recitation in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal, revealing the continued effects of the agency of these books as texts, objects, and deities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicIndian and Buddhist Studies→French-language works237,207→