MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132913833

Anomalous Bodies: Representations of Deformities in Children in Britain, 1740-1790

2022· dissertation· W7132913833 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Esther Elizabeth Atkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsNarrativeRepresentation (politics)PerceptionIntersection (aeronautics)Dual (grammatical number)Face (sociological concept)Period (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My dissertation examines the representation of anomalous bodies of children in 18th century Britain. Using the category of ‘deformity’, defined during this period as a lack of virtue, ugliness, and irregularity of the body, it considers how the 18th century child is represented in each of these areas. I argue that the bodies of children participate in the construction of the defective body as defined in the 18th century, but that this participation does not always conform to the dominant historical narrative that children are seen as medically unique from adults. Using a wide range of sources, including archival materials and published texts from different genres that present the physically anomalous child in different arenas, including the prescriptive literature, child labour, physical growth, and anatomy, I show that perceptions of, responses to, and the understanding of their physical differences was influenced by the cultural and medical worlds of the period. Children, I show, were special and the knowledge gained from observing them contributed to information about the broader adult world they inhabited and not just the world of children. My thesis lies at the intersection of the history of childhood, medicine, and disability. Through my analysis of the prescriptive literature that constructed the “ideal” child as free of or cured of their deformity, the dual representation of childhood in chimney sweeps in texts and images, the numerical gauging of irregular growth in children, and the use of child and foetal cadavers in anatomical pursuits, I show the defective body of the child calls into question the strengthening boundaries that separate the child from the adult during the 18th century and suggest the history of children’s medicine requires a more nuanced approach. The defective body of the child, therefore, brings into focus the nature of the connection between the worlds of children and adults during the 18th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.014
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes→French-language works237,207→