MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132916107

The Effects of USMB Combined with Fractionated Radiation Therapy on Tumour Vasculature and the ASMase-Ceramide Pathway

2022· dissertation· W7132916107 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Xuan Leong

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiation therapyAcid sphingomyelinaseProgrammed cell deathMicrobubblesCancerCancer therapyCancer cell
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiation therapy induces damage to tumor cells directly or indirectly via DNA damage, leading to tumor response. Previous studies have indicated that radiation therapy can be enhanced when combined with the vascular targeting effects of ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB). This USMB radioenhancement occurs via the activation of acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase). Clinical studies are currently looking into implementing USMB alongside radiation therapy to treat cancer patients. The work presented in this thesis determined the effects of fractionated radiation therapy combined with USMB on the tumor vasculature. Mice were divided into 3 categories, ASMase wild type, ASMase double knockout and ASMase wild type treated with sphingosine-1-phosphate. The results demonstrated the enhancement of cell death and reduced vasculature in combination treatments. Power Doppler ultrasound was used to observe vascular changes non-invasively. In conclusion, USMB can induce vascular disruption in an ASMase dependent manner, while enhanced tumor cell death potentially occur independent of ASMase activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicSphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingFrench-language works237,207