Bibliographic record
Abstract
A major challenge for modern Biology involves the elucidation of the genetic and molecular mechanisms that underlie natural variation in behavioural phenotypes. In the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, many genes that influence behaviours have been identified, primarily as a result of their mutant effects. However, the contributions of variation in these genes to naturally maintained behavioural variation is often unknown. The identification of genetic variation effecting naturally maintained behavioural variation will provide insight for therapeutic interventions. By resolving and quantifying the plasticity or flexibility present and maintained in the molecular cascades that regulate behavioural responses in natural populations, researchers will identify therapeutic limits within which it may be possible to manipulate the systems while potentially minimizing undesirable side effects. Toward enhancing the understanding of the genetic bases of natural behavioural variation, this thesis presents research on three different phenotypes, each of which have been previously described to different degrees. The first study involves an investigation meant to further resolve the molecular mechanism by which allelic variation in the for gene effects differences in foraging behaviours. The second study presents efforts to identify the genetic basis for variation in pupation position, a well-studied behaviour with known fitness consequences, and presents an initial description of associated variation in wandering behaviours. The third study investigates pupation behaviour from a more physiological perspective. In this study it was observed that larvae selected for high NaCl tolerance, which may have altered osmoregulatory abilities, pupate significantly farther from their growth media than do wild-type larvae. As a result, an effort was made to map the genetic factors effecting natural variation in NaCl tolerance. Taken as a whole, this work has the potential for extending the mechanistic understanding of complex interactions between genetic and environmental effects and the resultant behavioural responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".