MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132923189

Characterizing the Roles of the Perirhinal and Entorhinal Cortices in Configural Object Processing Across the Lifespan

2024· dissertation· W7132923189 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicCategorization, perception, and language
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerirhinal cortexEntorhinal cortexFunctional magnetic resonance imagingPerceptionObject (grammar)Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionTemporal lobeCognitionTemporal cortex
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In our environment, we encounter hundreds of objects which vary in their shape, texture, and colour. Critical to our perception and recognition of these objects is the ability to bind the configural arrangement between their constituent features into mental representations. Representational-hierarchical accounts characterize the medial temporal lobes (MTL) by the content and complexity of the representations that its subregions support. Specifically, nonhuman and human lesion studies point to the perirhinal cortex (PRC) as the primary site supporting configural object representations. More recently, however, age-related atrophy of the adjacent anterolateral entorhinal cortex (alERC) was shown to predict impaired configural processing. Anatomical boundaries between the PRC and alERC vary between individuals, making attempts to characterize separable roles of these subregions difficult. In this thesis, I aimed to disentangle the roles of the PRC and alERC in complex object representations, by delineating the MTL with a manual segmentation approach motivated by nonhuman and human histological findings. A large sample of younger and older adults (N = 94) completed a configural processing task while undergoing structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). I began my investigation (Chapter 2) by showing that volumetric changes in the alERC across the lifespan are linked to eye movement patterns reflecting configural processing. In Chapter 3, I leveraged fMRI activation among healthy younger adults to demonstrate how the alERC supports the PRC in distinguishing novel from familiar configural objects. Unlike the posteromedial entorhinal cortex, the PRC and alERC were sensitive to configurally recombined objects compared to repeated ones and also predicted eye movements related to novelty detection. In Chapter 4, I extended these analyses to a sample of community-dwelling older adults and found a marked decline in PRC and alERC activation for novelty. Finally, in Chapter 5, I provided a comparison of Chapters 3 and 4 to directly examine functional activation for configural processing in an aging context. By characterizing the roles of the PRC and alERC in object representations across the lifespan, the results presented in this thesis further critical insights into the organization of the human MTL and provide important implications for our understanding of cognitive aging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it