MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132923238

El fisco municipal en Colombia: análisis de algunos tributos pintorescos

2022· book· es· W7132923238 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Jairo Restrepo Lizcano, Blanca Lyda Bogotá Galarza, María Irene Díaz Castro

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Institucional FULL · 2022
Typebook
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Legal and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Metropolitan areaContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dos centenarios han transcurrido desde que Colombia se independizó del yugo español. Desde entonces, el sistema impositivo ha sufrido grandes cambios, en especial a causa de la justificación para crear contribuciones fiscales. De esa transición surgieron cambios políticos, económicos y sociales, al pasar de una relación del individuo con la “corona” a una perspectiva más amplia que incluye al Estado, la economía y la sociedad, y que representa tanto lo individual como lo colectivo. Algunos de los tributos municipales que se cobran actualmente vienen de esa transición, caracterizada por la intervención estatal en la vida de sus ciudadanos con su “bienestar” protegido por medio de servicios sociales organizados por el Estado, entre ellos, invertir en la construcción de cárceles y la alimentación de los encarcelados, el pago de los maestros, del vacunador, del médico y del cirujano, el embellecimiento del pueblo, el aseo y el adorno de sus calles, puentes, plazas, entradas públicas, así como en la reparación de las casas municipales, las carnicerías y los demás edificios públicos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositorio Institucional FULLSame topicLatin American Legal and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207