MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132923549

Variation in genes involved in neural plasticity -- risk for childhood psychiatric disorders

2003· dissertation· W7132923549 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jennifer Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
KeywordsTropomyosin receptor kinase BNeuroplasticityVariation (astronomy)Genetic associationMood disordersGenetic variationAssociation (psychology)CognitionGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deficits in neural plasticity, the ability of neural networks to modify structurally and functionally in response to internal and external stimuli, have been suggested to predispose individuals to psychiatric disorders. Two receptors, the N-methyl D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and the receptor tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB) are critical to neural plasticity pathways. First, this thesis tested the hypothesis that variation in the NMDAR subunit gene glutamate receptor, ionotropic N-methyl D-aspartate (GRIN2A) is involved in genetic susceptibility to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Linkage between GRIN2A and ADHD was not observed. In addition there was no significant evidence of a relationship between GRIN2A and three cognitive phenotypes, verbal short-term memory, verbal working memory and inhibitory control. This thesis tested a second hypothesis that variation in the neurotrophic tyrosine kinase, receptor, type 2 (NTRK2) gene, which encodes TrkB confers susceptibility to childhood-onset mood disorders (COMD). There was no significant evidence of association between NTRK2 and COMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder→French-language works237,207→