MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132925240

GL*: a propositional proof system for logspace

2005· dissertation· W7132925240 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Steven Perron

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2005
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicLogic, programming, and type systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Proof complexityBounded functionConstruct (python library)Propositional variableDirect proofProof theoryStructural proof theory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, there has been considerable research exploring connections between propositional proof systems, theories of bounded arithmetic, and complexity classes. We know that NC1 corresponds to G*0 and that P corresponds to G*1, but no proof system corresponding to a complexity class between NC1 and P has been defined. In this work, we construct a proof system GL*, which corresponds to L. Connections to the theory VL (Zambella's Sp0 - rec) are also considered. GL* is defined by restricting cuts in the system G*1 . The first restriction is syntactic: the cut formulas have to be Sigma CNF(2), which is a new class of formulas. Unfortunately that is not enough; the free variables in cut formulas must be restricted to parameter variables. We prove that GL* corresponds to VL by translating theorems of VL into tautologies with small GL* proof.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicLogic, programming, and type systemsFrench-language works237,207