MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132926165

Exploring the Surgical Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Its Impact on Skeletal Health, Cardiovascular Disease, and Mortality in Ontario, Canada

2025· dissertation· W7132926165 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bahar Golbon

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary hyperparathyroidismParathyroidectomyHeart failurePopulationDiseaseCohortEndocrine systemMyocardial infarction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), a prevalent endocrine disorder, significantly impacts the skeletal, renal, cardiovascular, and neurocognitive systems, with surgical parathyroidectomy (PTx) serving as the only definitive treatment. Despite the availability of safe and effective treatment, PHPT remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, necessitating further investigation into the benefits of PTx. This thesis utilized a cohort of biochemically diagnosed PHPT patients to evaluate outcomes associated with surgery. The findings revealed a 22% reduction in the hazard of any fracture, with both immediate and long-term benefits observed. We also identified a 20% decrease in the risk of any cardiovascular event compared to non-operative management. Specific cardiovascular benefits included reduced risks of ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. These findings underscore the potential for broadening the clinical application of PTx to improve patient outcomes, mitigate complications, and guide future population health strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→