MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132928266

Resistance Mechanisms to Mutant IDH Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2025· dissertation· W7132928266 on OpenAlexaff
ChengHuan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyeloid leukemiaIsocitrate dehydrogenaseDecitabineAzacitidineMutantTranscriptomeAcquired resistanceMyeloid
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological malignancy characterized by the accumulation of immature myeloid stem and progenitor cells.In AML, around 10% of patients carry mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene, which promote leukemic transformation through the production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (R-2-HG). Ivosidenib (IVO) is an inhibitor of the mutant IDH1 enzyme approved for the treatment of IDH1-mutated AML. Treatment with IVO can induce terminal differentiation of leukemic blasts via suppression of R-2-HG. However, ivosidenib as a single agent has limited efficacy, highlighting the need to better understand the mechanisms of drug resistance. In Chapter 1, I describe how a genome-wide functional genomic screen led us to discover that CLEC5A-SYK signaling mediates IVO resistance by inducing STAT5-dependent expression of self-renewal genes. This discovery provides rationale for combining STAT5 inhibitors with IDH inhibitors for IDH-mutated AML, which demonstrated superior efficacy over single-agents in our pre-clinical studies. In Chapter 2, I characterized the varied responses of genetically distinct subclones of IDH-mutated AML to IDH inhibitors and other anti-leukemic agents using single-cell proteogenomic sequencing in both single patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and mixed-PDX models. This study highlights the utility of applying single-cell proteogenomic analysis in PDX models to gain insights into mechanisms of drug resistance and potential strategies to combat them. In Chapter 3, I describe a Bayesian statistical model that uses Gaussian process regression to remove droplet- and sample-specific technical noise in single-cell protein sequencing data. I demonstrate how this method improves data interpretability, uncovers true biological variation, and removes spurious findings. The final chapter is inspired by the technical difficulties in integrating a cell’s functional properties with single-cell sequencing readouts. This challenge stems from the fact that current single-cell assays for detecting genetic alterations or mRNA abundance ultimately kill the cell, thus eliminating the possibility of any functional interrogation. To this end, I describe the development of a technology that detects specific mRNA and converts this detection into a fluorescent signal within living cells using RNA-targeting CRISPR enzymes. Since the cells remain alive during the process, the fluorescently labeled cells can be isolated by FACS for functional characterization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→