MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132935142

Against Arcadia: Rereading Pastoral in Contemporary Poetry in Canada

2020· dissertation· W7132935142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Max Karpinski

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2020
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForegroundingAnthropoceneAppropriationPoliticsNeoliberalism (international relations)Context (archaeology)IndigenousPoetry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Against Arcadia” argues that the pastoral persists in Canadian poetry, often redeployed to address the ongoing manifestations of settler-colonialism and the ever-accelerating environmental crisis. I read this emergent critical pastoral in the context of governmental tactics aimed at the material dispossession of land, health, and life, linking neoliberalism and the attendant fraying of social relations to intensifying ecological degradation. The logic of neoliberal capital privileges a particular mode of relationality that underlies what Eric Cazdyn and Imre Szeman name a “common sense” that naturalizes the political and economic status quo. Against this neoliberal common sense, the redistributed pastoral invokes a “sense of the common,” my critical shorthand for a reorganization of ways of being and relating in the Anthropocene that might open onto a more equitable and just “common world.” I begin with two texts that borrow explicitly from pastoral predecessors: Lisa Robertson’s XEclogue (1993) and Erin Moure’s Sheep’s Vigil by a Fervent Person (2001). In Robertson’s appropriation of Virgil and Moure’s “transelations” of Portuguese bucolics, I find two, related models for contemporary engagement with the pastoral: the seed bomber and the terraformer. My second and third chapters, focusing on Jordan Abel, Rachel Zolf, and George Elliott Clarke, complicate the “common” by foregrounding the pastoral’s correspondence with both settler colonialism’s dispossession of Indigenous land and what Christina Sharpe identifies as the historical and ongoing “climate of antiblackness.” Together, these chapters demonstrate the necessity of approaching both the Anthropocene concept and the pastoral in Canada through the lens of settler colonialism. In the fourth chapter I turn to the oil sands poetry of Stephen Collis and Rita Wong, arguing that their “petropastoral” poetry positions extractivism as a contemporary manifestation of settler-colonial appropriation, one carried out at the expense of the health and livelihood of predominantly Indigenous, racialized, and poor communities. Responding to the entanglements of neoliberalism, global capital, settler colonialism, and extractivism, “Against Arcadia” offers the contemporary pastoral as one particular mode through which to approach the question of how to think and write poetry in Canada under the sign of the Anthropocene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0390.022
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature→French-language works237,207→