MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132935433

Politics of Style: The Vestiges of Modernism in Ukrainian and Jewish Writing in the 1930s

2024· dissertation· W7132935433 on OpenAlexaff
Olga Khometa

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianModernism (music)PoetryContext (archaeology)PoliticsScholarshipJudaismThe Holocaust
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation explores how prominent modernist writers responded to the onset of Stalinism in the early 1930s and highlights modernist artistic practices, such as the technique of ventriloquism and the descriptive grotesque as means of parody and the grotesque aesthetics, which were a common feature of the poetry created by Ukrainian poets Pavlo Tychyna and Mykola Bazhan in the early 1930s. It reveals a similar artistic trend, and specifically, parody and self-parody in the poetry of the Jewish author Osip Mandelshtam from the same period. The introductory chapter engages in the scholarly debate regarding the relationship between modernism and socialist realism. It offers a discussion of existing scholarship on modernism in Ukrainian and Russian literatures as well as a comparative analysis of the Soviet policies towards Ukrainian and Russian literatures and cultures in the late 1920s – early 1930s. It provides a historical and theoretical background for the following three chapters on Tychyna’s, Bazhan’s and Mandelshtam’s later poetry, respectively. In addition to close reading, each of these chapters provides historical and literary context for the artistic practices employed by the selected authors. For instance, the second chapter’s discussion of the descriptive grotesque technique in Bazhan’s three long poems “Ghetto in Uman’,” “Hoffmann’s Night” and Blind Bards is put in the context of the development of the grotesque in Western art and literature. In the third chapter’s discussion of the technique of ventriloquism and its carnivalesque grotesque framework in Pavlo Tychyna’s poetry books Chernihiv and Party Leads, the dissertation highlights a similar use of this formal technique in Aleksandr Blok’s poem “The Twelve,” which belongs to the modernist Russian literary tradition. This chapter offers a radically new approach to Soviet Ukrainian literature and culture by breaking through established ethical and ideological taboos in a significant reassessment of Ukrainian political poetry in the 1930s, its aesthetic and ideological value. It challenges the extant scholarship on Tychyna by asserting that his poetry in the early 1930s should primarily be viewed as modernist rather than socialist realist. The fourth chapter reveals how manipulations with the lyrical “I” as well as parody and self-parody in Mandelshtam’s Moscow Notebooks signal the late modernist project in Jewish writing in the early 1930s. Overall, this dissertation re-evaluates the significance of modernism in the USSR in the early 1930s by highlighting the late modernist aesthetics in Jewish writing as well as the vestiges of modernism in Ukrainian literature that have been previously overlooked.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicSoviet and Russian History→French-language works237,207→