MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132937022

Dynamic, Hardware-Conscious Tuning of Concurrent Multithreaded Analytical Database Queries

2024· dissertation· W7132937022 on OpenAlexaff
Sofia Tijanic

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuery optimizationHash functionOnline aggregationExecution timeSargableProfiling (computer programming)Query languageQuery planHash table
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis introduces a framework called PCMonitor that monitors underlying hardware metrics during a program’s execution and enables applications to make dynamic, runtime changes in order to achieve better performance. We apply PCMonitor to a custom hash join implementation in order to emulate main-memory database systems and show the performance improvement of concurrently running queries. In modern databases, optimizations in query planning and resource allocation happen before a query executes, thereby disregarding the runtime hardware conditions that are often different than what can be predicted during the optimization process. PCMonitor makes use of performance counter events and memory profiling in order to monitor hardware conditions continuously as a query is executing and then algorithmically makes decisions about certain actions and re-configurations that the query can take in order to improve performance. This takes traditional query optimization one step further by creating elastically adapting queries that act based on real- time conditions. We show that by making runtime decisions using PCMonitor, concurrently running queries can make better decisions about pausing and resuming their execution, sharing memory resources and sharing hardware resources, resulting in up to 50% better performance for individual queries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207