MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132937602

Development and testing of a criteria and indicators system for sustainable forest management at the local level. Case study at the Haliburton Forest Wild Reserve Ltd., Canada

2002· dissertation· W7132937602 on OpenAlex
Thorsten Mrosek

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2002
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainable forest managementForest managementAdaptive managementIdentification (biology)Management by objectivesSustainable developmentSet (abstract data type)Temperate forest
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of criteria and indicators (C&I) for sustainable forest management (SFM) requires further development and testing at the local level. Suitable case studies of applying advanced local level C&I are lacking. The study was based on the hypothetical suitability of C&I for defining, measuring, assessing and monitoring sustainability. The research objectives were to develop a C&I system, which consists of an optimal and minimum generic C&I set for the local level, which has applicability for the SFM of temperate forests internationally, and can be utilized as an adaptive management system. This case study took place at the Haliburton Forest & Wild Life Reserve Ltd. in Ontario, Canada. The selected forest of approximately 24,000 hectares is highly suitable because of its multiple use and nature-oriented forest management system. The methods applied for the development and testing of the C&I system included: the development of the optimal and minimum generic set of C&I for SFM at the level; the identification of verifiers and norms; the testing of the generic C&I set as a case study; the development of indicator measurement databases including a geographic information system; the assessment of the state of the forest and its management; and the application of adaptive management procedures. The generic C&I set consists of four principles, 16 criteria and 58 indicators. The C&I system consists of a sequence of generic modules which can be applied internationally in temperate forests while specifying and addressing local conditions. These modules are: the formulation of goals and objectives; the identification of local forest management standards; the application of the generic C&I set; the assessment of C&I performance; and the application of adaptive management procedures. The Haliburton Forest shows a very good sustainability assessment result with a sustainability assessment score of 89.9%. 41 indicators out of 58 show a positive, the remaining 17 indicators a neutral sustainability trend. The C&I system for SFM at the local level is suitable for defining, measuring, assessing and monitoring the sustainability of forest management. This study contributes to the definition, promotion, implementation and evaluation of SFM at the local level internationally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it