MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132938634

Hydrothermal fluid chemistry and flow paths associated with the Archean Matagami VMS system, Abitibi subprovince, Canada

2004· dissertation· W7132938634 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. E. Ioannou

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrothermal circulationArcheanFluid inclusionsGreenstone beltQuartzVolcanogenic massive sulfide ore depositBasalt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cathodoluminescence reveals that volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS)-related quartz from the sim;2.7 Ga Abitibi greenstone belt, Canada, is of preserved hydrothermal origin. Fluid inclusions hosted within the quartz preserve samples of Archean VMS-related hydrothermal fluid. Microthermometry on ore-hosted primary liquid-vapor inclusions from the Matagami deposits indicates that the VMS hydrothermal fluid was highly saline (16.2 +/- 4.7 eq.wt.% NaCl-CaCl 2 [1sigma; n = 230]) and of moderate temperature (Tt = 208 +/- 32°C [1sigma; n = 230]). Quartz-epidote veins located in the hydrothermal cracking horizon (HCH) of the Bell River Complex (BRC) at Matagami host primary liquid-vapor-halite inclusions. These inclusions are samples of the deep-seated equivalent to the VMS ore-hosted hydrothermal fluid and were trapped as high-temperature brines (Tt = 373 +/- 44°C [1sigma; n = 92]; 38.2 +/- 1.9 eq.wt.% NaCl [1sigma; n = 92]) interpreted as phase separated products of (modified) seawater, an exsolved magmatic fluid, or a combination thereof deep within the hydrothermal system at sim;650°C and a near-lithostatic pressure of 90 MPa. X-ray diffraction (XRD) has identified large VMS-related hydrothermal alteration signatures, which extend well beyond ( sim;1,000+ m) the limits of the Matagami deposits. These signatures include hanging wall alteration assemblages probably produced during the waning stages of VMS hydrothermal activity, which are characterized by relatively low temperature fluids (Th = 76° to 177°C [n = 212]) of variable salinity (6.0 eq.wt.% to 32.4 eq.wt.% NaCl-CaCl2 [n = 212]) and high apparent CaCl2 content (XNaCl

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→