MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132940491

Poverty and Health: Key Issues in Health Care

2014· other· en· W7132940491 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Sharon Gazeley, Sonia Ter Kuile

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto
KeywordsPovertyRedressHealth carePublic healthInequalityHealth policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poverty is an important determinant of health and illness, which has profound effects throughout the life cycle. Poverty is strongly linked to many adverse health outcomes and associated with a higher incidence, prevalence, and severity of chronic illness, acute illness, and injuries.1 Physicians can make a difference for individual patients by integrating a “determinants of health” approach into patient-centred care while assisting with access to health care, income supports, and resources. Addressing poverty helps redress inequalities in health—an important ethical concern. An understanding of the facts about poverty in Canada and practical strategies will allow family physicians (FPs) to intervene and care for patients affected by poverty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0100.021
Scholarly communication0.0140.016
Open science0.0030.011
Research integrity0.0160.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→French-language works237,207→