The Effects of Dairy and Non-dairy Aternatives on Post-prandial Gycemia and Appetite in Healthy Young Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hypothesis that dairy products will reduce post-prandial glycemia (PGG) and appetite more than their plant-based alternatives before and after a fixed size meal in healthy young adults was explored. Experiment one compared one-serving of Greek yogurt or cheddar cheese to their plant-based alternatives. Experiment two compared one-serving of 2% milk, vanilla soy beverage, vanilla almond beverage, cheddar cheese, and vegan cheese. In experiment one, PPG was reduced by premeal consumption of Greek yogurt and cheddar cheese compared to their plant-based alternatives. In experiment two, PPG differed among dairy products and their plant-based alternatives. Similarly, post-prandial appetite and appetite responses during the second meal were product dependent. Overall, premeal consumption of semi-solid and solid dairy food resulted in lowered PPG than their plant-based alternatives. Future research is necessary to determine components in dairy products and their plant-based alternatives that contribute to PGG, insulin responses, and appetite control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".