MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132949914

Statistical Learning Changes Across Development

2022· dissertation· W7132949914 on OpenAlexaff
Tess Allegra Forest

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory Processes and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatistical learningCognitionStatistical analysisStatistical modelCognitive developmentPrefrontal cortexChild developmentAsk price
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statistical learning is widely credited with empowering learners of all ages to extract the environmental regularities necessary to piece together the structure of their worlds. Its availability to learners of all ages, however, belies important differences in how statistical learning likely changes across development. Acknowledging this developmental change has broad implications for understanding the cognitive architecture of statistical learning, but very little past work has addressed possible developmental differences across childhood. In this thesis, I present three experiments highlighting the ways in which ongoing cognitive and neural development shape the operation of statistical learning, demonstrating that statistical learning changes in quality with age and experience. In Chapter 2, I ask whether the memory representations formed as a result of statistical learning vary with age. I report that while adults and older children (8-9-year-olds) form general and specific memories for statistical structures, young children (5-7-year-olds) remember only specific information. In Chapter 3, I directly investigate the neural underpinnings of statistical learning in 9-10-year-old children and young adults, and show that children rely more on parietal and temporal cortices and posterior hippocampus to support statistical learning than adults, who rely on ventral prefrontal cortex and anterior hippocampus. Accordingly, children represent general memories in the posterior hippocampus and IFG, while adults represent them in the vmPFC. In Chapter 4, I characterize the interaction between prior knowledge and attention during statistical learning in adulthood, laying the groundwork for developmental investigations of how children’s attention and minimal experience shape statistical learning. Specifically, I ask how experience in an environment shifts the focus of attention during learning, and show support for the idea that as a learner gains experience in an environment, they attend to successively more complex aspects of that environment. In Chapter 5, I review these interconnected findings, and reiterate that our understanding of statistical learning will be incomplete without considering how the input and output change with cognitive and neural development. Together, the studies in this dissertation offer clear insight into how developmental changes in statistical learning fundamentally alter the ways in which children interact with, learn about, and remember their experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicMemory Processes and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207