MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132953497

Theology and the Narrative Form of the Victorian Realist Novel

2020· dissertation· W7132953497 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amy Coté

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2020
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThomas Hardy Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaFaculty of Arts and SciencesUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsNarrativeParallelsProtestantismFaithRealmNovellaApostasyVerisimilitudeConfession (law)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation argues that Christian theology informs how Victorian realist novelists understood narrative perspective and the formal strategies used to communicate a narrator’s knowledge. Although the Victorian realist novel has typically been considered a secular form, I challenge this assumption by showing how narrative features such as selective unreliability, direct address, and omniscience can be read alongside theological conversations. I thus argue that the development of the realist novel in the nineteenth century is more closely intertwined with theological thought than narratives of nineteenth-century secularization have encouraged us to believe. The opening chapter looks to two crisis-of-faith novels: John Henry Newman’s Loss and Gain (1848) and James Anthony Froude’s The Nemesis of Faith (1849). I read these novels alongside debates about philosophical certitude emerging from the Oxford Movement and argue that, where Newman’s novel borrows from the language of literary form to think about religious certainty, Froude’s apostasy narrative instead applies a rigid formal logic back to the realm of the literary. My second chapter moves from Newman’s and Froude’s novels to Charlotte Brontë’s fictional autobiographies, Jane Eyre (1848) and Villette (1853). I situate both novels within traditions of spiritual life-writing to argue that confession as a predominantly Protestant literary genre and a largely Catholic liturgical sacrament provides narrative structure for Brontë’s autobiographical heroines. My third chapter extends this discussion of narrative voice by examining Mary Augusta Ward’s philosophical novel Robert Elsmere (1888) alongside works by George Eliot and Anthony Trollope. I consider the novels’ respective sermons as formal parallels to the second-person direct address typical in Victorian fiction, and argue that such instances of preaching articulate a Broad Church response to religious plurality. My final chapter on Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the D’Urbervilles (1891) argues for the relevance of the theological doctrine of omniscience for understanding the novel’s idiosyncratic omniscient narrator. The thesis in its entirety thus argues that narrative perspective from the autobiographical voice to the omniscient narrator should be read in relation to both literary-historical and theological conversations in the Victorian period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.038
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicThomas Hardy Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207