MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132953497

Theology and the Narrative Form of the Victorian Realist Novel

2020· dissertation· W7132953497 on OpenAlex
Amy Coté

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2020
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThomas Hardy Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaFaculty of Arts and SciencesUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsNarrativeParallelsProtestantismFaithRealmNovellaApostasyVerisimilitudeConfession (law)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation argues that Christian theology informs how Victorian realist novelists understood narrative perspective and the formal strategies used to communicate a narrator’s knowledge. Although the Victorian realist novel has typically been considered a secular form, I challenge this assumption by showing how narrative features such as selective unreliability, direct address, and omniscience can be read alongside theological conversations. I thus argue that the development of the realist novel in the nineteenth century is more closely intertwined with theological thought than narratives of nineteenth-century secularization have encouraged us to believe. The opening chapter looks to two crisis-of-faith novels: John Henry Newman’s Loss and Gain (1848) and James Anthony Froude’s The Nemesis of Faith (1849). I read these novels alongside debates about philosophical certitude emerging from the Oxford Movement and argue that, where Newman’s novel borrows from the language of literary form to think about religious certainty, Froude’s apostasy narrative instead applies a rigid formal logic back to the realm of the literary. My second chapter moves from Newman’s and Froude’s novels to Charlotte Brontë’s fictional autobiographies, Jane Eyre (1848) and Villette (1853). I situate both novels within traditions of spiritual life-writing to argue that confession as a predominantly Protestant literary genre and a largely Catholic liturgical sacrament provides narrative structure for Brontë’s autobiographical heroines. My third chapter extends this discussion of narrative voice by examining Mary Augusta Ward’s philosophical novel Robert Elsmere (1888) alongside works by George Eliot and Anthony Trollope. I consider the novels’ respective sermons as formal parallels to the second-person direct address typical in Victorian fiction, and argue that such instances of preaching articulate a Broad Church response to religious plurality. My final chapter on Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the D’Urbervilles (1891) argues for the relevance of the theological doctrine of omniscience for understanding the novel’s idiosyncratic omniscient narrator. The thesis in its entirety thus argues that narrative perspective from the autobiographical voice to the omniscient narrator should be read in relation to both literary-historical and theological conversations in the Victorian period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it