MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132956798

Calidad una inversión o un sobrecosto

2013· article· es· W7132956798 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrés Felipe Espinosa Ocampo

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidente · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Management and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction system (computer science)Cost analysisContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La multinacional IMPRESOR, es una compañía dedicada a la fabricación de impresoras y cartuchos de tinta, manejando la modalidad de comodato para la mayoria de sus clientes. Con la crisis de los los EEUU en 2007, IMPRESOR se vio obligada a tomar acciones para reducir costos de produccion, inicialmente la fabricación de los consumibles (cartuchos), y de las impresoras se realizaba en Canada, con estandares altos de calidad y costos de producción razonables. Para sobrellevar la crisis y generar ganancias que sostuvieran la operación Impresor decide abrir una nueva planta en Panama ya que este País ofrecia excelentes condiciones tributarias, ademas del bajo costo de la mano de obra. La nueva planta recibia continuas visitas de un ente regulador para poder contar un un sello de calidad. En una de las visitas se evidenciaron fallas en los procesos de producción, generando una no conformidad, por tal razon se solicito una revisión detallada de todos los procesos y se generaron planes de acción para corregirlos. Este hecho fue acompañado de unas directrices del ente regulador que obligaba a Impresor a buscar a cada uno de sus clientes y entregarles un documento en el cual se explicaban las fallas que se podian presentar con sus productos, Esta situación genero deconfianza en la mayoria de los clientes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de OccidenteSame topicOrganizational Management and InnovationFrench-language works237,207