MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132958672

Multimodal Collagen Mapping in a Partial Bladder Outlet Obstruction Rodent Model and the Development of Photoacoustic Ultrasound as a Novel Collagen Imaging Tool

2025· dissertation· W7132958672 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Brett Koven

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoacoustic imaging in biomedicineBladder outlet obstructionUltrasoundFibrosisRat modelUltrasound imagingDeposition (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial bladder outlet obstruction (pBOO) is a common condition that leads to collagen deposition and irreversible bladder fibrosis, severely affecting patient quality of life. Despite the clinical impact, current methods for assessing bladder collagen are limited, relying on invasive tests or late-stage clinical indicators. This thesis adapts a pBOO rodent model to map collagen throughout the bladder wall using both histological and molecular techniques across health, disease, and over time. Additionally, a novel, non-invasive photoacoustic ultrasound imaging technique was adapted to assess collagen content and distribution. The results show progressive, location-specific changes in collagen, with a strong correlation between imaging and gold-standard histological assessments. Overall, this work elucidates the heterogeneity of bladder collagen deposition and establishes a foundation for using photoacoustic ultrasound as a non-invasive tool in bladder fibrosis assessment. These findings offer valuable insights for early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and timely intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207