MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132962751

“Hear Me Out”: An Exploratory Study on the Psycho-Social and Educational Experiences of Racialized, South Asian Emerging and Young Adults

2025· dissertation· W7132962751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nivatha Moothathamby

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRacial and Ethnic Identity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoiceMental healthPsychosocialCoping (psychology)Exploratory researchPopulationDiasporaEthnic groupConceptual frameworkNarrative
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The South Asian diaspora started immigrating and seeking refuge in Canada in the late 1890s, due to war conditions in the homelands, and to seek better life opportunities. However, they are a neglected, understudied group within psychology and educational research today. Based on other racialized groups' experiences and evidence of disparities, it is important to study this population and identify present disparities and strengths. This dissertation research explores the lived mental health and educational experiences of 22 South Asian, first and second-generation, emerging, and young adults living in Canada, between the ages of 18 – 35 years. The purpose of this study is to identify and understand the intersectional, bi-cultural experiences of this population in navigating life, their strengths, cultural stigma, coping patterns, holistic barriers, intergenerational trauma, ethno-racial identity, and inequity. The emphasis will lie in understanding how their strengths and drawbacks play a role in navigating the mental health careand educational systems and society. Mixed methods are utilized for this research, which include a semi-structured interview, photovoice activity, demographics questionnaire, and the Cross-Cultural Coping Scale. Theory of Psychosocial Development, Critical Race Theory, and Positive Youth Development are the theoretical and conceptual frameworks used to analyze the findings from this study.With a novel approach compared to past research, narratives are presented that help to understand the complex intersectional experiences between South Asian culture, Canadian culture, mental health, education, stigma, intergenerational trauma, coping patterns, and resilience. Participants reported stories about building their ethno-cultural and racial identity, and their negative mental health struggles, which were associated with intergenerational trauma, academic stress, and life pressures from society. They reported the standards for a successful life, according to the South Asian community, which included choosing a career that yielded high financial outcomes and high social prestige. However, this was not the case for many. Regardless of the bi-cultural challenges they faced, the South Asian Canadians showed elevated resilience, with the help of their support systems and adaptive strategies. This novel knowledge can lead to the development of support and resources to assist South Asian Canadians in navigating through life and these systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchFrench-language works237,207