MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132962815

Non-invasive MRI-based Pipelines for Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas Molecular Biomarker Identification and Beyond Using Machine Learning

2025· dissertation· W7132962815 on OpenAlexaff
Khashayar Namdar

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)RadiomicsIdentification (biology)Receiver operating characteristicOutlierInferenceRandom forestSoftware
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) is the most common type of brain cancer among children, and molecular marker identification of pLGG is crucial for successful treatment planning. The current standard of care is biopsy, which is invasive. Thus, non-invasive imaging-based approaches, where Machine Learning (ML) has high potential, are impactful. We curated a large dataset of pretherapeutic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans for developing non-invasive pLGG molecular subtype identification. In this work, first, we conducted dataset size sensitivity analysis and determined that 132 patients would suffice for training a reliable pLGG molecular subtype identification pipeline using MRI-based radiomics. Additionally, we observed performance variance when training and validation splits were repeated. Inspired by the first study, we proposed Open-radiomics as a collection of standardized radiomics datasets, a radiomics research protocol, and a base pipeline for radiomics-based brain tumour pathology classification using open-source adult patient datasets. In the third study, we introduced the IMICS ROC analyzer, a method and software for the identification of outliers in retrospective studies. Relying on the first three studies, in the fourth study, we redesigned the pipelines to (1) provide per-patient ML-based inference for our bi-institutional pLGG radiomics dataset and (2) identify outliers using IMICS ROC analyzer. The open-radiomics-based design of the fourth study enabled us to measure the confidence of our subtype identifiers using a Monte Carlo method. We included three additional studies using more advanced ML techniques to improve the pipelines. In the fifth study, we demonstrated that Large Language Models (LLMs) could augment the clinical data and improve the pLGG subtype identification pipelines. In the sixth study, we used convolutional neural networks (CNN) and proposed 3D probability distribution functions of tumour location to allow the classifiers to explore beyond the manual segmentation masks provided by neuroradiologists. In the last study, we improved the performance of the CNNs using a novel multiclass area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) loss function. We leveraged radiomics, ML, LLMs, and CNNs and developed non-invasive pLGG molecular subtype identification pipelines tailored for precision medicine, enabling improved clinical adoption and patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→