MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132967186

Ensuring reasonable access to abortion services in Nepal

2006· dissertation· W7132967186 on OpenAlexafffund
Purna Shrestha

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2006
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsBank of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsAbortionObligationHuman rightsGovernment (linguistics)State (computer science)Unsafe abortionFamily planning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2002, abortion has been legalized under certain circumstances in Nepal. However, Nepalese women are still deprived of the legal and safe abortion services. By developing a framework on reasonable access to abortion services, this study basically explores on what is expected out of any state machineries to guarantee women's right to abortion. It will further examine the Nepalese government's obligation under national laws and international human rights instruments to ensure reasonable access to abortion services, and argues that by being unable to do so Nepal violates women's human rights. Finally, the study put forward recommendations to the Nepalese government for ensuring reasonable access to abortion services to Nepalese women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207