MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132967979

The association between asthma and dental caries in Canadian Aboriginal preschool children

2007· dissertation· W7132967979 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Jocelyne Abi-Nahed

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2007
Typedissertation
Language
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Health and Care Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsAsthmaOral healthPopulationEarly childhood cariesMedical diagnosisAssociation (psychology)Epidemiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The literature suggests that asthmatic children may be at an increased risk for early childhood caries (ECC). Objective. To investigate the potential relationship between dental caries risk and asthma in a population of Canadian aboriginal preschoolers. Methods. Secondary analyses of oral health and health status data collected as part of an evaluative study of a community-based prenatal nutrition program for the prevention of ECC in the Sioux Lookout Zone. 471 Ojibway-Cree 2-5 year-olds were examined using the dmft/s index. A case of 'severe' ECC was defined as a child's dmft ge; 11. Health questionnaires were completed and asthma diagnoses were confirmed by reviewing the medical charts. Results. Asthma prevalence was 28.9% and 55% had S-ECC. Children with asthma were 1.85-times more likely (95% CI: 1.44-3.26, p=0.035) than those without asthma to have ECC. Conclusion. Asthma had a significance influence on the risk of caries in First Nations children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicDental Health and Care Utilization→French-language works237,207→