MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132969034

Grid Entropy in Last Passage Percolation, a Variational Formula for Gibbs Free Energy, and Applications to a ”choose the best of D samples” Model

2022· dissertation· W7132969034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubadditivityErgodic theoryUpper and lower boundsEntropy (arrow of time)GridRegular polygonExponentBounded function
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Working in the setting of i.i.d. last-passage percolation on R^D with no assumptions on the underlying edge-weight distribution, we develop the notion of grid entropy: a deterministic directed norm with negative sign that measures the proportion of empirical measures of edge weights (in a fixed direction or direction-free) which converge weakly to a given target measure. Though grid entropy and its convex duality to point-to-point/point-to-level Gibbs Free Energy have already been discovered by Rassoul-Agha and Seppalainen [19], our approach is novel in that we realize grid entropy as both a Subadditive Ergodic Theorem limit and equivalently as the threshold exponent of canonical order statistics associated with the Levy-Prokhorov metric. We use this new framework to re-derive various properties of grid entropy, including an upper bound on the sum of relative and grid entropies and upper semicontinuity. We also show that the direction-free case is nothing more than the direction-fixed case in the (1,1, ...,1) direction. In addition, we connect these results to the work of Bates [3] and partially answer a directed polymer version of a question of Hoffman. Shifting gears, we proceed to study these objects in a model consisting of repeatedly taking D samples from a distribution and picking out one according to an omniscient ”strategy.” We show that the set of limit points of empirical measures is almost surely the same whether or not we restrict ourselves to strategies which make the choices independently of all past and future choices, and moreover, that this set coincides with the set of measures with finite grid entropy. These setsare convex and weakly compact; we characterize their extreme points as those given by a natural ”greedy” deterministic strategy and we compute their grid entropy to be 0. This yields a description of the set of limit points of empirical measures as the closed convex hull of measures given by a density which is D Beta(1,D) distributed. We also derive a simplified version of a grid entropy-based variational formula for Gibbs Free Energy for this model, and we present the dual formula for grid entropy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it