MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132969553

The molecules of ritual: promoting, producing, and performing raving and clubbing in Toronto

2004· dissertation· W7132969553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Morgan Gerard

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceEthnographyFraming (construction)Conversation analysisDiscourse analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

*This dissertation is a compound document (contains both a paper copy and a CD as part of the dissertation). The CD requires the following system requirements: Windows MediaPlayer or RealPlayer. This dissertation investigates raving and clubbing as performances of ritual. It follows Victor Turner's call to locate the original matrix of ritual in the multi-dimensionality of those contemporary cultural events which he referred to as liminoid phenomena. In doing so, it describes music and dance as the central expressions and experiences of raving and clubbing. Ethnographic research on the practices of raving and clubbing was conducted in Toronto, Canada from 1997 to 2001. Informant testimonials on the communal, magical, spiritual, and quasi-religious experiences associated with raving and clubbing position ritual as a framework of analysis derived from practitioners. A review of the dominant sociological literature reveals metaphorical and anecdotal references to raves and clubs as ritual spaces and raving and clubbing as ritual practices to be largely inadequate. An anthropological approach to the study of ritual as a performed sequence of events is taken through an analysis of music, dance, and the auxiliary media which promote their meanings as rites in and of youth culture. The performance roles of disc jockeys, dancers, and organizers are described to examine music, dance, and event design and advertising as the practices through which raving and clubbing are conceived, received, and interpretively framed by participants as ritual. The framing of raving and clubbing as ritual is considered historically through an analysis of the technologies of playing records and the social application of those technologies by disc jockeys associated with the cultures of disco in New York City, house in Chicago, and acid house and rave in England. Underground dance music and the disco concept are identified as the musical and performance genre shared by those culture and the ravers and clubbers in Toronto who index their social mythologies to situate their rites as authentic and meaningful. Describing successful performances of underground dance music records by disc-jockeys as a journey, the processual model of ritual developed by Arnold vanGennep and refined by Turner is invoked to examine how this performance idiom structures the expressions and experiences of liminality through music and dance. Raving and clubbing are thus considered opportunities for participants to engage in ritual performances of transcendence and transformation.*

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicMusic History and Culture→French-language works237,207→