Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the high nonlinearity and complex reactions occurring in fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU), solving the time optimal control problem is especially challenging. Also constraints on the state variables make the problem even more difficult. However, the large throughput of FCCU, the change in operating conditions and the substantial economic benefits are the motivation behind this research. To solve the time optimal control problem based on the realistic model, the four-lump FCC model proposed by Ali and Rohani (1997) is used with small modifications. The modifications are justified by providing better agreement with the industrial data of the steady state and dynamic simulations. During the operation of a FCCU, the kinetic parameters may change and for adequate control, those parameters should be up-dated, especially when the feed is changed. In this work, Luus-Jaakola (LJ) optimization procedure is first applied to the estimation of kinetic parameters in the four-lump kinetic model for the riser reactor, and is then applied to the entire model of FCC unit. The results show better agreement with experimental data of Wang (Lee et al., 1989a) and the industrial data (Ali and Rohani, 1997). In addition, the significance of incorporating line search into LJ optimization procedure is illustrated by faster convergence and more accurate results for all the optimization problems in parameter estimation. The computations are reasonably fast, so in the future with faster computers the parameters can be up-dated on-line. Based on the developed dynamic model with the estimated kinetic parameters, a steady state optimization problem is solved to provide the desired optimal operation point for time optimal control. Compared with the industrial operating conditions, the optimal steady state obtained by using LJ optimization procedure increases the economic benefit by 17.33%. In solving the time optimal control problem of FCC unit, iterative dynamic programming (IDP) provides an efficient way to obtain the optimal control policy and to handle the constraints in a highly nonlinear dynamic system. The time to reach the vicinity of the desired state is significantly reduced with the use of time optimal control policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".