MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132977150

Association between Serum Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) and Cancer Recurrence among Adult Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC): A retrospective cohort study

2024· dissertation· W7132977150 on OpenAlexaffabout
Judy Qiang

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Health Services and Policy Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyThyroid cancerHazard ratioThyroidThyroid-stimulating hormoneHormoneThyroidectomyCancerCohort
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is a common endocrine neoplasm. Initial treatment involves thyroidectomy with or without radioactive iodine (RAI) and usually followed by thyroxine treatment, a synthetic thyroid hormone replacement. Serum Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), also known as thyrotropin, is monitored to guide thyroxine dosing to maintain thyroid function and to avoid TSH elevation which may stimulate residual tissue and promote DTC recurrence. There is currently limited evidence to guide TSH targets in DTC survivors after initial management. While keeping TSH in the normal reference of 0.5-4 mIU/L is adequate for maintaining normal thyroid function, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommend targeting a TSH in the lower range of <2 mIU/L to reduce recurrence risk. However, there is limited evidence regarding the benefit of targeting TSH in this tighter range, particularly in patients with tumours that have a low-risk of recurrence. This lack of evidence may result in variations in practice, and may expose patients to unnecessary, excess treatment and associated morbidities such as atrial fibrillation, stroke, and non-traumatic fractures with uncertain benefit. In that context, we sought to determine the relationship between exposure to low normal TSH (0.5-2 mIU/L) as compared to high normal TSH (2-4 mIU/L) and disease recurrence in DTC patients who underwent thyroidectomy in Ontario from 2007 to 2018. We also evaluated the association between TSH exposure and non-cancer outcomes of atrial fibrillation, stroke, non-traumatic fractures, and all cause death. This was a retrospective cohort study of surgically treated DTC patients using linked, administrative health databases. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between serum TSH values and time to recurrence and non-cancer outcomes, with TSH treated as a time-varying exposure. TSH was modeled as a time-updated instantaneous and cumulative exposure, both as a continuous and categorical variable. Disease recurrence was defined as a composite outcome of the first occurrence of repeat surgery or radioactive iodine (RAI) at least 1 year following initial surgical treatment, or DTC specific death. The cohort comprised of 26,336 individuals (78% female), with a median age of 50 years, followed for a median of 5.9 years. There was a modest but significant direct association between increasing TSH and risk of disease recurrence (adjusted cause specific hazard ratio [csHR] 1.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001-1.001, p<0.0001), after adjustment for relevant covariates. In multivariable, competing risk analysis modeling TSH as a categorical variable, we found that compared with instantaneous exposure to TSH between 0.5-2 mIU/L (referent), exposure to TSH 2-4 mIU/L was associated with a similar risk of disease recurrence (adjusted csHR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89-1.32, p=0.4468). Exposure to TSH outside the normal range (>4 mIU/L) was associated with a significant increase in disease recurrence compared to the referent range of 0.5-2 mIU/L (adjusted csHR 1.53, 95% CI 1.33-1.77, p<0.0001, csHR 3.10, 95% CI 2.59-3.71, p<0.0001, csHR 18.47, 95% CI 16.05-21.26, p<0.0001 for TSH <0.5 mIU/L, >4 - ≤10 mIU/L and >10 mIU/L, respectively). When TSH categories were modeled as cumulative exposure, we found that there was no increase in disease recurrence risk for each additional 3 months of exposure to TSH 2-4 mIU/L compared to the referent range of TSH 0.5-2 mIU/L (adjusted csHR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.02, p=0.5507). In contrast, each additional 3 months of exposure to TSH above the normal range (>4 mIU/L) were associated with a significant 7% increased risk of disease recurrence (adjusted csHR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.09, p<0.0001). Exposure to TSH <0.5 mIU/L or 0.5-2 mIU/L was not associated with a higher rate of atrial fibrillation, strokes, non-traumatic fractures or all cause death compared to TSH 2-4 mIU/L. In conclusion, in this cohort of DTC survivors, there was no benefit of exposure to low-normal TSH between 0.5 and 2 mIU/L compared to high-normal TSH (2-4 mIU//L) on risk of DTC recurrence. Therefore, our results suggest that the TSH target may be safely liberalized up to 4 mIU/L without increased recurrence for DTC survivors. Future studies such as randomized controlled trials should be considered to confirm these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→