MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132977619

Methotrexate-loaded Microbubbles for Ultrasound-triggered Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2023· dissertation· W7132977619 on OpenAlexafffund
Yara Ensminger

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsInflammatory bowel diseaseMicrobubblesPhospholipidMethotrexateIn vitroSalineLiposomeDrug
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methotrexate (MTX) is a systemically injected immunomodulatory drug used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The goal of this thesis was to develop ultrasound-responsive MTX-loaded, phospholipid microbubbles (MBs) with comparable in vitro stability as existing clinical MBs and with sufficient drug-loading for future ultrasound-guided, targeted, MTX treatment of IBD. To quantify drug-loading and stability with different lipid formulations, four different MTX-phospholipid complexes were formed via co-solvent evaporation, and used to stabilize oil droplets in water. Subsequent lyophilization formed empty MTX-lipid shells, which were fluorocarbon gas-filled and reconstituted with saline to form MTX-MBs. MTX-MB stability was greater when MTX-18-carbon lipid (DSPC) complexes were used in comparison to MTX-16-carbon lipid (DPPC) complexes (60 minutes and 160 minutes at 37 ̊C, respectively). MTX-loading varied substantially between formulations, with highest drug-loading being 7.2 ± 3.01 μg per 109 DSPC MBs. Based on results, these MTX-loaded MBs are a promising approach for future, targeted, IBD treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→