MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132977694

An Investigation of Consumers' Moral Licensing Behavior

2014· dissertation· W7132977694 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole Raye Robitaille

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2014
Typedissertation
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcquiescenceLicenseIntervention (counseling)DeedModerationExtant taxonCircumstantial evidenceHarmClosure (psychology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research suggests that when individuals have done a good deed, this grants them `license' to engage in more self-interested, immoral or asocial behaviors that otherwise would have discredited the individual. A number of studies across disciplines have found evidence of such licensing effects, yet our understanding of what causes these effects is limited. It is clearly counterproductive if a good deed is likely to be followed by a bad one. Such a regulatory pattern threatens people's moral integrity and undermines personal welfare, yet no research examines how to counteract it. In Essay 1 "Removing Individuals' License to Misbehave," I present an intervention aimed at counteracting the licensing effect. I demonstrate that having participants engage in a physical act of closure - enclosing a written recall of their good deeds within an envelope - counteracts their licensing behavior. This intervention targets what I propose is a critical but overlooked condition for moral licensing to occur: the accessibility of one's previous good deeds. Furthermore, I contribute to our understanding of moral licensing by examining a novel moderator of the licensing effect, the actor-perceived specialness of one's good deed. Research has found that changes in self-concept may mediate the licensing effect. In Essay 2 "Examining Self-Concept as a Mediator of Licensing Effects", I critically examine this process. Across three studies I replicate the licensing effect, but find no significant relationship with participants' self-concepts. In each study, self-concept was measured using scales previously established in the licensing context, yet none of these mediated participants' licensing behavior. Based on both theoretical as well as empirical findings, I propose that our current self-concept measures need to be re-examined.By advancing our understanding of moral licensing behaviors and demonstrating how to counteract them, this dissertation provides significant practical and theoretical contributions for our understanding of moral licensing effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment→French-language works237,207→