MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132979157

The Preparation, Experiences and Challenges of Novice Principals in Ontario's Small Rural Schools

2016· dissertation· W7132979157 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peter Edwards

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2016
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association for the Study of Adult Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocializationMandatePrincipal (computer security)Task (project management)Qualitative researchRural areaExperiential learningRural management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unique characteristics of the rural setting, which includes isolation, smaller than average schools, a strong sense of community, uniformity of often limited employment, and lack of community resources, create additional challenges for a novice principal. The new principal, who is often from outside the community, faces a daunting task as they move into their first principalship. They must navigate the micro-politics of their new school â leading staff members who have often been at the school for years, even decades. They must recognize how and when to push their staff for improvement, while simultaneously ensure they develop a collaborative culture. They must balance the board and provincial mandate while still meeting the expectations of the community. The novice rural principal must also cultivate positive relationships with the parents and the community. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the preparation and experiences of novice rural principals in Ontario. The eleven participants were drawn from eight district school boards and represent Ontarioâ s diverse rural schools. Their responses demonstrated that principals felt prepared for their new role in large part because of the experiential learning they had prior to assuming the principalship. Some of the challenges identified in other jurisdictions including work-life balance, isolation, legacy of the predecessor, extra demands of rural communities and supervision of staff were also experienced here in Ontario. There were three new themes that emerged from this study. The first was the important role that school superintendents played in the socialization of novice rural principals into their new role as well as the important support the superintendent did or did not provide. The effect that rapid principal turnover had was also discussed in this study. Finally, many rural boards are recruiting principals from outside their own cadre of leaders, which impacted the novice rural principal as they transitioned not only into their new school but also their new board. This qualitative study contributes to the Canadian literature on rural school leadership and novice principals. It concludes with recommendation for both practice and future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies→French-language works237,207→