MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132979274

Cryo-electron microscopy of membrane proteins ; lipid bilayer supports and vacuum-cryo-transfer

2003· dissertation· W7132979274 on OpenAlexaff
Mike Strauss

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsBibliographical Society of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipid bilayerMembraneMembrane proteinMonolayerTransmission electron microscopyElectron microscopePlant lipid transfer proteinsPeripheral membrane proteinBilayer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unsupported lipid bilayers for use as near-native supports for electron microscopy (EM) of membrane proteins have been formed by immersing EM grids coated with fenestrated plastic through a lipid monolayer on a Langmuir-Blodgett trough. After insertion of membrane proteins by proteoliposome fusion, quick freezing and freeze-drying, these fragile proteo-bilayers can be stabilized for EM by evaporating a thin layer of carbon onto the lipid surface. A system was designed for transfer of carbon stabilized lipid bilayers from the carbon evaporator into a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM), while the specimen remains under vacuum at liquid nitrogen temperatures. The system consists of a vacuum transfer shuttle, a spring-loaded specimen gripping device, and a gated STEM adapter unit. With this system membrane proteins can be imaged in the EM, with the molecules remaining immobilized in the form they had while in aqueous media, for subsequent 3D structure determination by single particle analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior→French-language works237,207→