Aesthetics in Action: Sophocles' Conception of Tragic Plot and Character
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theoretical analysis of tragedy is generally thought to begin with Aristotle’s Poetics. In my dissertation I argue that a century before Aristotle, Sophocles offered a sophisticated, self-conscious theory of tragedy. I contend that he presented this theory in and through his dramaturgy. Through close readings of three Sophoclean dramas—Trachiniae, Ajax, and Philoctetes—I show that this playwright not only staged plot (mythos), character (êthos), and thought (dianoia) but, in doing so, offered his audience a nuanced meditation on these aspects of drama. In sum, Sophocles theorizes:1) Tragic plots (mythoi) as representations of the resistance of myth to delimitation. 2) Tragic characters (êthê) as representations which compel moral assessment from two mutually complicating temporal perspectives at once. 3) Tragic characters’ thoughts (dianoiai) as represented not only in speech but also in subtext, gestures, silences, and other semiotic means. These conceptions not only anticipate Aristotle’s analysis of tragedy in the Poetics but also oppose it. The alternative view of tragedy they offer enriches our understanding both of Attic drama in its fifth-century performative context and of ancient Greek aesthetic theory more broadly. Additionally, Sophocles’ theory of tragedy has distinctive philosophical implications. Tragic plot and characters, as he theorizes them, share an inscrutability with their analogues in the real world. That is, tragedy in the Sophoclean mould exposes the epistemological limitations of its audience for interpreting certain components of experience shared between theatre and life: how actions relate, who others are in moral terms, and what others are thinking. At the same time, Sophoclean theatre presents an ethic for dealing with such limitations. Both the characters on-stage and the audience in the theatre of Dionysus are challenged by the interpretive difficulty of Sophocles’ plots and characters. But various characters in the plays learn to confront this challenge by humbly tempering their judgments and embracing a disposition of compassion (οἶκτος). The recognition by such characters that οἶκτος is the best response to the opacity of their ‘world’ translates into an ethical lesson for the spectator as to how best to respond to the similar opacity of their own world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".