MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132983449

A study of response of adsorbed layers of hydroxypropyl cellulose to variations in ambient humidity

2003· dissertation· W7132983449 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Minseok Seo

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdsorptionHydroxypropyl celluloseCapillary condensationCapillary actionMoistureSorptionCelluloseHumidityCondensation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellulose derivatives are versatile polymers with broad industrial applicability. Their performance is critically dependent on their interaction with water. In this work we seek an in-depth understanding of how variations in humidity affect surface properties of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose (HPC). Using the Surface Force Balance technique and Atomic Force Microscopy we studied the properties of adsorbed HPC layers as a function of ambient humidity. We found that HPC layers shrink following adsorption of moisture. Based on our observations; the hysteresis noted in the HPC layers compression-decompression cycles and the recovery of the layer's properties upon drying, we propose a two-step mechanism of water sorption by fibers of HPC. In step one, adsorption of moisture is dominated by capillary condensation in the voids and capillaries of the fiber-like HPC layer. In step two, water penetrates inside the fibers and forms a surface gel, whereas the inner cores of the fibers retain their rigidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207