MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132985578

Neurogenetic and plastic components of food-related behaviors due to the foraging gene in Drosophila melanogaster

2007· dissertation· W7132985578 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Karla Renea Kaun

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2007
Typedissertation
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsForagingDrosophila melanogasterMechanism (biology)Drosophila (subgenus)Feeding behaviorTasteOlfactionSignalling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Successful foraging is necessary for procurement of nutritional resources necessary for an animal's survival. Foraging behavior is driven by a physiological response to the absence of food, and is identified by a number of behaviors including finding, evaluating, acquiring, and consuming food. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the underlying genetic basis of this complex behavior. In Drosophila melanogaster, natural genetic variation for food-specific locomotion has been localized to a single major gene, the foraging (for) gene. This provides a unique opportunity to investigate the cellular, genetic, and selective mechanisms that mediate food-related behavior. This thesis describes for's influence on food acquisition, the homeostatic mechanisms underlying energy balance, and learning and memory. These findings show that for affects food intake, glucose absorption and allocation, and glycogen storage. In addition to a role in regulating energy acquisition and storage, for also affects the response to both extended periods of depleted food, and brief periods of food absence. Changes in for expression can induce corrective changes in food intake and blood glucose levels in response to food deprivation. Moreover, for inhibits neuropeptide Y-like receptor cells to induce changes in food acquisition and locomotion on food, thus introducing a novel mechanism through which for mediates foraging behavior. This thesis also introduces a role for for in the ability to associate an odor with a taste reward, thus confirming a relationship between foraging behavior, learning and memory. The role of for in several aspects of foraging behavior described here suggests that it influences higher-order integrative brain function. Furthermore, for's role in energy homeostasis, learning, and memory suggest it influences the phenotypic response to environmental change, and thereby affects plasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research→French-language works237,207→