MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132988363

Architecture and CAD Techniques for Efficient FPGA Implementation of Machine Learning and Other Applications

2022· dissertation· W7132988363 on OpenAlexaff
Jin Hee Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayFlexibility (engineering)Convolutional neural networkConvolution (computer science)SoftwareArchitectureReconfigurable computingKernel (algebra)Artificial neural network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) offer an alternative to application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) that is attractive in scenarios where flexibility may be required or where chip volumes are not sufficiently high enough to justify the costs of a custom chip. The flexibility of FPGAs offer users the power/performance benefits of a custom hardware implementation, compared to software running on a processor, without committing to one specific design. However, the flexibility can lead to inefficiencies in terms of development time, area, performance, and power. FPGAs are used for a variety of applications and different optimizations can be applied to increase efficiency of FPGA implementations. This thesis considers techniques that can be applied to achieve efficient implementation of machine learning and other applications on an FPGA from the perspectives of architecture and computer-aided design (CAD). We consider the use of a high-level synthesis (HLS) tool to synthesize an accelerator for deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on an FPGA. We implement a complete end-to-end system running on an Arria 10 SoC FPGA. The accelerator implements zero-skipping and reduced-precision convolution with minimal impact on accuracy. We evaluate various versions of the accelerator through software changes and tool constraints alone. Then, we propose architecture changes to the carry-chain architecture in FPGAs to improve the resource utilization of binarized CNNs (BNNs). We add additional carry-chain circuitry that propagates sum instead of the carry. We demonstrate that we are able to reduce FPGA resource utilization while keeping the additional circuit area small. Lastly, we propose to re-map some of the look-up-tables (LUTs) to use the existing carry-chain architecture in order to increase performance by adding a post-LUT mapping step to the FPGA CAD flow. Using a subject graph that closely matches the underlying hardware, we are able to select critical paths to take advantage of the existing fast dedicated carry-chain routing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207