Elucidating the Role of Lipid Binding Domains in V-ATPase a-subunits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
V-ATPases are H+ pumps essential for housekeeping functions such as acidifying Golgi, lysosomes, and endosomes. V-ATPases on the plasma membrane (PM) of osteoclasts pump acid onto the surface of bone to demineralize bone, while V-ATPases on the PM of tumour cells acidify the extracellular space required for metastasis. A drug design towards inhibiting V-ATPase activity to prevent bone loss or metastasis must develop a strategy for targeting only V-ATPases on the PM of tumour cells or osteoclasts without affecting V-ATPases involved in housekeeping roles. In mammalian cells, the V-ATPase a subunit has four isoforms, a1-4, that are responsible for targeting V-ATPases to specific cellular locations. Human mutations in the four isoforms have been linked to different diseases. Among the four isoforms, a2 is found in the Golgi membrane while a3 and a4 are primarily expressed on the PM of osteoclast, and kidney cells, respectively. In invasive cancer, both a3 and a4 at the PM of tumour cells are required for tissue invasion and metastasis. Protein primary structures reveal a putative phosphoinositide (PIP) binding domains, containing a highly conserved basic motifs within all a isoforms. Using site-directed mutagenesis, I showed that the basic motifs to affect PIPs interaction and that disruption of the interaction impaired membrane targeting of the N-terminal domains of both a2 and a4 isoforms. In addition, altered levels of membrane PIPs mislocalized both proteins. Mutations in a1, a2, a3 and a4 are associated with epileptic encephalopathy, cutis laxa, osteopetrosis and renal tubular acidosis (dRTA), respectively. To understand the role of a subunit-PIPs interaction in human diseases, disease-causing mutations occurring within the putative binding domains, specifically: a2.K237_V238del (cutis laxa), and a4.K237del (dRTA) demonstrated defective PIP binding in vitro and impaired membrane retention/targeting in HEK293 cells. This data suggests that the a2-PI(4)P interaction is required for Golgi retention/targeting, and a4¬-PI(4,5)P2 interaction is required plasma membrane retention/targeting. This work enhances our understanding of a subunit functional domains, and informs potential targeted therapeutic treatment for metastatic cancer and bone loss pathologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".