Predicting the early age temperature response of concrete using isothermal calorimetry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simplified thermal simulation tool was developed for predicting the temperature rise due to hydration within concrete elements including those that contain slag or fly ash. The purpose of the program is to perform a rough thermal analysis without requiring detailed technical inputs. The simulation is designed to perform its analysis on a 2-D section through the element using a finite difference method, taking into account surface convection and conduction to adjacent materials, as well as solar radiation. An experimental program involving isothermal heat-conduction calorimeter testing was used to help populate the model with data for cementing materials commonly available in Ontario, including several Portland cements and a number of blast-furnace slags and fly ashes at various replacement levels. To verify the simulation results, results from the simulation will be compared to the results of two different field trials involving mass concretes with high levels of SCM replacement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it